
Justice Saurabh Banerjee said consenting adults in a live-in relationship have the right to choose and live with a partner without interference from family or friends.
The Delhi High Court granted police protection to a couple in their 30s who said the woman’s father and brother had threatened them over their relationship. In its August 13 order, the court described a consensual live-in relationship as akin to marriage and said societal prejudice cannot curtail adults’ fundamental rights.
A couple in their 30s who told the Delhi High Court they had been threatened by the woman’s father and brother has been granted police protection.
Justice Saurabh Banerjee’s August 13 order said the two consenting adults had the right to choose their partner and live together without interference from parents, relatives or friends. The couple said they had been living together for some time and intended to marry, but their relationship had drawn threats of violence from her family.
They had approached the local Station House Officer with a complaint, but told the court that no action followed.
The court said a live-in relationship between consenting adults is “akin to marriage”, even where the partners are not legally married. It noted that the Supreme Court has recognised adults’ right to reside together without wedlock, and referred to the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which also recognises such relationships in law.
GTK covers the news, people, culture, neighbourhoods, civic life and food shaping India’s cities. Better Starts With Us.